NEWS2U Media
The Truth Mainstream Media Avoids

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

“Get Your Loved Ones Off Facebook”

A Very Disturbing and Powerful Post – “Get Your Loved Ones Off Facebook”

By Michael Krieger
Feb. 5, 2015
Liberty Blitzkrieg



“Oh yeah, I’ve been meaning to ask you why you’re getting off Facebook,” is the guilty and reluctant question I’m hearing a lot these days. Like we kinda know Facebook is bad, but don’t really want to know.
I’ve been a big Facebook supporter – one of the first users in my social group who championed what a great way it was to stay in touch, way back in 2006. I got my mum and brothers on it, and around 20 other people. I’ve even taught Facebook marketing in one of the UK’s biggest tech education projects, Digital Business Academy. I’m a techie and a marketer — so I can see the implications — and until now, they hadn’t worried me. I’ve been pretty dismissive towards people who hesitate with privacy concerns.
With this latest privacy change on January 30th, I’m scared.
– From Salim Varani’s blogpost: Get Your Loved Ones Off Facebook
I never heard of Salim Varani before today, but when I came across his blogpost “Get Your Loved Ones Off Facebook,” it immediately piqued my interest given my less than positive feelings toward the company. It took on an even greater degree of importance in my mind considering that I had just finished reading what appeared to be a Facebook puff piece at Fusion.net about how the company, guided by “privacy sherpa” Yul Kwon, was suddenly making user privacy a core focus. It read like a PR release. 

Here are a few excerpts:
The face of the new, privacy-conscious Facebook is Yul Kwon, a Yale Law grad who heads the team responsible for ensuring that every new product, feature, proposed study and code change gets scrutinized for privacy problems. His job is to try to make sure that Facebook’s 9,199 employees and the people they partner with don’t set off any privacy dynamite. Facebook employees refer to his group as the XFN team, which stands for “cross-functional,” because its job is to ensure that anyone at Facebook who might spot a problem with a new app — from the PR team to the lawyers to the security guys — has a chance to raise their concerns before that app gets on your phone. 
 “We refer to ourselves as the privacy sherpas,” says Kwon. Instead of helping Facebook employees scale Everest safely, Kwon’s team tries to guide them safely past the potential peril of pissing off users.

Kwon, 39, has a million-dollar testament to his ability to orchestrate group dynamics. He was the winner of the 13th season of Survivor, the season in which the CBS reality show controversially divided contestants by race (Kwon is of South Korean descent). His competitors said his gift of diplomacy helped him win — though some called him a “puppetmaster.” “I learned how to navigate difficult environments,” Kwon now says.
Kwon has been bouncing back and forth between Silicon Valley and D.C. for most of his career, with a few stops in front of T.V. cameras. His roller coaster of a resume includes business consulting at Google, crafting Joe Lieberman’s security legislation (in the emotionally-charged but bipartisan period after September 11th), working on net neutrality at the FCC (the first time it came around), acting as a TV host for CNN and PBS (for shows on Asian-American issues and American infrastructure), and making People Magazine’s Sexiest Men Alive and Hottest Bachelors lists (he’s married with kids now).
The privacy sherpas seem to be effective. James Grimmelmann, a University of Maryland professor with a long history of analyzing Facebook’s privacy mistakes, says the company has turned a new page. “Facebook is not my go-to suspect when I open up the news and look for privacy problems. In 2008 and 2009, they did something wrong like clockwork every few months. It was a nasty cycle,” he says. “Facebook moves carefully now. It doesn’t want to move fast and break things anymore.”

Ok, so they make this guy seem like a combination of Obi-Wan Kenobi and James Bond. The message is clear: Facebook cares about privacy now.
Well about five minutes after reading that, I read a post by the aforementioned Salim Varani, who in no uncertain terms claims precisely the opposite.  

One thing is clear. One of these articles is  very right, and the other is very wrong. Given my bias, I lean with Varani. 

Here are some excerpts from his powerful piece:
“Oh yeah, I’ve been meaning to ask you why you’re getting off Facebook,” is the guilty and reluctant question I’m hearing a lot these days. Like we kinda know Facebook is bad, but don’t really want to know.
I’ve been a big Facebook supporter – one of the first users in my social group who championed what a great way it was to stay in touch, way back in 2006. I got my mum and brothers on it, and around 20 other people. I’ve even taught Facebook marketing in one of the UK’s biggest tech education projects, Digital Business Academy. I’m a techie and a marketer — so I can see the implications — and until now, they hadn’t worried me. I’ve been pretty dismissive towards people who hesitate with privacy concerns.
With this latest privacy change on January 30th, I’m scared.
Facebook has always been slightly worse than all the other tech companies with dodgy privacy records, but now, it’s in it’s own league. Getting off isn’t just necessary to protect yourself, it’s necessary to protect your friends and family too. This could be the point of no return — but it’s not too late to take back control.
It’s not just what Facebook is saying it’ll take from you and do with your information, it’s all the things it’s not saying, and doing anyway because of the loopholes they create for themselves in their Terms of Service and how simply they go back on their word. We don’t even need to click “I agree” anymore.
They just change the privacy policy and by staying on Facebook, you agree. Oopsy!
Facebook doesn’t keep any of your data safe or anonymous, no matter how much you lock down your privacy settings. Those are all a decoy. There are very serious privacy breaches, like selling your product endorsement to advertisers and politicianstracking everything you read on the internet, or using data from your friends to learn private things about you – they have no off switch.
Facebooks gives your data to “third-parties” through your use of apps, and then say that’s you doing it, not them. Everytime you use an app, you’re allowing Facebook to escape it’s own privacy policy with you and with your friends. It’s like when my brother used to make me punch myself and ask, “why are you punching yourself?” Then he’d tell my mum it wasn’t his fault.
  • They have and continue to create false endorsements for products from you to your friends – and they never reveal this to you.
  • They’ve used snitching campaigns to trick people’s friends into revealing information about them that they chose to keep private.
  •  They use the vast amount of data they have on you, from your likes, things you read, things you type but don’t post, to make highly accurate models about who you are — even if you make it a point of keeping these things secret. There are statistical techniques, which have been used in marketing for decades, that find correlating patterns between someone’s behaviour and their attributes. Even if you never posted anything, they can easily work out your age, gender, sexual orientation and political views. When you post, they work out much more. Then they reveal it to banks, insurance companies, governments, and of course, advertisers.
     
    The issue here isn’t what we have to hide, it’s maintaining an important right to our freedom — which is the right to privacy, and the right to have a say in how information about us is used. We’ve giving up those rights forever by using Facebook.
There’s no need to talk hypothetically about government surveillance here.
One of the first Facebook investors called Greylock has board connections to a CIA investment firm called In-Q-Tel. According to their website, it “identifies cutting-edge technologies to help the Central Intelligence Agency and the broader US Intelligence Community to further their missions”.
And if you haven’t heard – it was revealed that Facebook data is delivered directly to the PRISM programme.
That’s why they slowly changed the default privacy settings to public, made privacy settings harder and harder to use, and now are pretending that their privacy helper will change this.
In reality, there a loads of privacy breaches you can’t turn off, like allowing advertisers to use your endorsement to your friends, turning off how Facebook tracks what you read on the internet, or disallowing Facebook from collecting other information about you. You can’t turn them off!
Even if you have nothing to hide, you have to worry about the opposite, what Facebook chooses to hide that you want to be shared.

They filter you.
“I’ve been meaning to ask you why you’re getting off” usually comes after something like, “didn’t you see my post last week?”
If you’ve ever had that conversation, you’ve noticed that there’s a big disconnect between your expectations when you communicate on Facebook and what really happens. Basically, Facebook filters out your posts based on whether or not people will use Facebook more if they don’t see it.
In reality, lots of your posts are never seen by anyone! 

And you miss out on their stuff too. Even if your friends’ stuff gets to you fine, it doesn’t mean your stuff gets to them.
Facebook’s blocks posts based on political content it doesn’t like. They blocked posts about Fergusson and other political protests. When Zuckerberg alledgedly went a bit nuts and banned the word “privacy” from meetings at Facebook, it was also blocked from any Facebook post. You just got an error message about “inappropriate content”. Yeah, uh huh.
Inappropriate for who?
Facebook goes so far as to let political organisations block your communication. It just takes a few people to mark the same news article as offensive, and it drops from everyone’s feed. This is often abused. I can block any article from Facebook by getting a few friends to mark it as offensive. Cheap and easy censorship.
If you’ve ever used Facebook contact sync, or used Facebook on your mobile phone, Facebook took your complete contact list. Real names, phone numbers, addresses, emails, everything. 
They then use that to create “shadow profiles” of the people you know who aren’t on Facebook. Non Facebook users often see this in action, in the form of emails to them from Facebook, containing their personal information. Facebook users can see this when they upload a picture of a non-Facebook user, and they’re automatically tagged. My friend’s not on Facebook, but since me and a few friends used Facebook on our phones, Facebook has his name and contact information, plus knows who his friends are because it sees him in their address book and calling records. 
In Europe, Facebook is legally oblidged to share exactly what information it has about you – but they refuse. So there’s yet another class action lawsuit against them.
Through it’s labyrinth of re-definitions of words like “information”, “content” and “data”, you’re allowing Facebook to collect all kinds of information about you and expose that to advertisers. With your permission only they say, but the definition of “permission” includes using apps and who knows what else.
On top of this, they allow all the Facebook apps full access to your information – with your name and everything. And even if you never use any apps on Facebook, your friends do. When they use apps, your friends share all your information for you. There’s a whole industry behind this.
Some things DO have off buttons, but keep in mind they are temporary, and as Facebook has done in the past, it will switch them back on without letting you know. When Facebook started (and probably when you joined) it was clearly a safe place to share with your friends only.

That was their big promise. Over time, they switched the default privacy setting to public so that if you still wanted to keep Facebook for friends only, you had to manually find over 100 settings on multiple hidden settings pages. Then, they started dropping those settings and forced information to be public anyway.
That’s even scarier because Facebook is used heavily for political advertising, and product endorsements. People know I raised money for kids with cancer before, so they might not be surprised if they see an ad where I’m endorsing a Christian outreach programme poor kids in Africa. But I categorically only support programmes that don’t have religious allegiances, since they’re known to bias their support to people who convert. Worse, a lot of people might assume things about my religious beliefs based on these false endorsements. Don’t even get me started on all the hypey startup stuff I don’t condone!
 
That’s simply insane and incredibly creepy.
We can have no idea if our endorsement has been used to sell flakey crap in our name. I don’t want to think about my mom wasting her money on something she thought I was endorsing, or my startup founder clients seeing adverts for useless products with my face under them.
Using Facebook means this happens all the time. Advertisers can buy your endorsement on Facebook and your information from third-party data brokers. You never get to know about it, and you can’t turn it off.
Facebook is also insisting to track your location via your phone’s GPS, everywhere and all the time. It’ll know extactly who you spend your time with. They’ll know your habits, they’ll know when you call in sick at work, but are really out bowling. “Sal likes 2pm Bowling at Secret Lanes.” They’ll know if you join an addict support group, or go to a psychiatrist, or a psychic, or a mistress. They’ll know how many times you’ve been to the doctor or hospital, and be able to share that with prospective insurers or employers. They’ll know when you’re secretly job hunting, and will sell your endorsement for job sites to your friends and colleagues — you’ll be revealed.
This is simply a consequence of their business model. Facebook sells you out, because that’s exactly how they make money. And they’re under heavy pressure from their investors to make more.
According to the FTC settlement from a few years ago, after Facebook was sued by the US goverment for its privacy practices, Facebook is “required to prevent anyone from accessing a user’s material more than 30 days after the user has deleted his or her account;”
There are different interpretations of this. Some say you need to delete each post separately, others say delete your account, and some say they’ll still keep your data anyway — that all you can do is stop giving them more data.
I’m going to do both as a precaution. There are a few helpful browser add-ons that will delete your posts individually, which I’m running now but needs some baby-sitting to keep running.
And some great instructions on actually deleting your account while Facebook tries to trick you into deactivating it instead.
To stop Facebook from tracking what I read on the web, (they do this even if you don’t have a Facebook account) I’ve installed Ghostery. It’s been pointed out to me that Ghostery provides information to advertising networks if you enable GhostRank, and have been recommended Privacy Badger or disconnect.meinstead. (And while you’re at it, the EFF made this great plugin that automatically chooses the most secure web connection, making it more difficult for governements and ISPs to snoop your web activity.)
I considered a bunch of Facebook alternatives, and might end up on Diaspora butemail and phone have actually been much better! After a month off Facebook, I don’t feel the need for a direct replacement. The phone – go figure. Everyone already has one, and we forget how super easy and convenient they are to use. I see fewer pictures, but I actually talk to people.
Remember, this isn’t just about the technical stuff. By staying on Facebook, you’re granting them permission to collect and use information about you, regardless of you even using the Internet. And by staying on, the data they collect on you gets used to create models about your closest friends and family, even the ones who opted out.
Lastly, the world is full of people who say “it’ll never happen”, and when it does, they switch to “there’s nothing we can do.” There is. The Internet was decentralised for 50 years, and is full of options, by design, that allow us to maintain privacy. We have a say in the world we want to live in — if we take action ourselves. Plus, we can help everyone understand, and help them make their own choices more informed.
This post has been read by 300,000 people now. It’s a positive sign that we can inform and educate ourselves!

If any of your friends and family use Facebook you owe it to them to share this post. I also suggest reading his entire article, which contains a huge amount of links and can serve as a resource for a lot more information on the topic.
As I tweeted the other day:

*The awesome thumbnail photo at the top of this post is by Polish illustrator Pawel Kuczynski. Check out his site here.
For related articles, see:
In Liberty,
Michael Krieger
http://saintsal.com/facebook/
__________________

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Interesting security implications with Win 10

Analysis of Windows 10: In its principle, it is only a terminal to collect information about the user's fingers, eyes and voice!

Aug 11, 2015
 
News editors AE delivers exclusive insights from our administrator on the latest operating system Windows 10 from Microsoft. We expect that after reading the article already will look differently on your computer, and every time you turn it on.
 
With the advent of Windows 10, I decided to investigate this operating system a few tests and the results of my research, I would now like to introduce. The collected knowledge can be alarming for someone, but I must admit that at the time of mobile platforms, Android and iOS, it's not surprising, at least for me. 

Operating system Windows 10 is inherently more of a terminal end, than the operating system, because many processes and function of this system are directly or indirectly dependent on remote servers and databases. Microsoft Windows 10 is the first operating system from Microsoft that some of the functions of the extended core operating remotely placed on their servers.
What is happening under your fingers?
Windows 10 performs a collection of texts entered on the keyboard. The texts are stored in temporary files and 1x 30 minutes shall be sent to the following sites:
 
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
pre.footprintpredict.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
 
The transfer is encrypted and should be anonymous. However, there is the risk that the transmission contains or may optionally contain identifiers of your machine or your person. Telemetry server collects information about your location in the network, IP and geographical location. Footprintpredict transmits your keyboard input of the search engine Bing from Microsoft.  

This is a smart solution, if that is you're writing to chat about the holiday, Windows 10 will send your text data taken from the keyboard and Bing, and your input, the next day when you come to Bing you will see the main page of search engines offers on hotels and shopping suggestions because yesterday you wrote on Windows 10 "in encrypted chat program” to a friend that you are going to a hotel, etc.
 
So your 'secret' conversation with a friend is now part of a Bing ad with all the trimmings. And when you talk of encrypted via SIP communications, voice port Cortana search,  everything you say, but more on that later in this article. Microsoft is not the only marketing company dependent on user input in the browser Edge, but it can intercept keyboard input text in any application running on Windows 10. That is ahead of Google to Microsoft.
 
Voice port in Windows 10 marketing promotes a virtual person "Cortana"
 
Surely by now you guess what it is. Even if you install Windows 10 on an encryption program to communicate with someone over the Internet, by gathering information from the keyboard (key logging), Microsoft can read what you wrote. It can’t seem to capture what you wrote the other side of encrypted communication, but at least one side intercepting communications, this is a very serious matter.
 
The third server is again in charge of the machines Tele-metrics, new Windows 10 now behaves very much like Android, where most of the operations at the operating system includes a telemetry hook, ie. clues that relate to any information about the user. If, for example. I will write to the browser Edge any telephone number, up to approx. 5 minutes to gradually send information about the number of these telemetric Microsoft servers:
 
vortex.data.microsoft.com
vortex-win.data.microsoft.com
telecommand.telemetry.microsoft.com
telecommand.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
sqm.telemetry.microsoft.com
sqm.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
 
A special situation occurs if anywhere in Windows 10 you type the name of a famous American film. Windows 10 will start by itself after some time to look at your hard drive in a folder with media files and index them. Indexed file is then anonymously sent to those servers in about 30 minutes when the computer is idle, I was unable to accurately determine the time period:
 
df.telemetry.microsoft.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
cs1.wpc.v0cdn.net
vortex-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
pre.footprintpredict.com
 
Collecting information entered via the keyboard is alarming security risk
 
Czech films did not work, no packet communication on the internet while typing on the keyboard of Czech films has taken place. This feature is very dangerous, because what happens if Windows 10 in a media folder, finds illegally ripped American film?  If you name it to the disc as a "seminarka.mkv" about it not to declare Windows 10 (Windows 10 apparently does not scan the file contents, index, and it only sends metadata). It is possible that this is the collection of data for future targeted offers to purchase movies.
Waiting for a passport photo? With Windows 10 you have it with the American authorities, apparently after turning on webcams.
After the first activation of Windows 10, and after the first turn on the web camera over the Internet sends around 35 MB of data to these servers:
 
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
vortex-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
 
The operation is executed only 1x and I failed to capture the data. It is possible that sending data from a web camera runs at longer intervals (days or weeks). I do not know what and why the camera is turned on after my first hook reached the Internet and dispatched much data. Given the two above mentioned servers last I fear that this is a "feature" on the social network that integrates your photo someplace, but I really do not know where and rather not think I wanna know. The problem for deeper analysis is that all transfers of data to Microsoft servers are encrypted and not without some deeper reverse engineering can figure out what's actually sent. Your picture from web camera for US national security might not be completely excluded variant. Quite I wonder expression of someone from Microsoft, what it meant.
 
On a laptop it is always good to blind the webcam, maybe a piece of tape. In Windows 10 you will probably need to ...
 
Exactly the same, if not worse is the situation with Android, which all photographs and inputs from a mobile camera can store on their servers and even if you do not use Google Drive cloud storage is certainly not the problem remotely from your phone, pull the picture. The Windows operating system is a bit different situation. It is a working system in companies and in offices and such massive spying and data collection can be abused must also industrial espionage against the United States to countries in Europe and other countries.
Tell me who you are and I will remember you, wherever you are!
The biggest problem I see in the voice port Windows 10, which is newly equipped with a voice assistant Cortana. The system responds only to English (yet). But nevertheless quite intimidating.  

Voice samples of what you say in a voice port, they are immediately sent to the following Microsoft servers:
 
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
vortex-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
pre.footprintpredict.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
telemetry.appex.bing.net
telemetry.urs.microsoft.com
cs1.wpc.v0cdn.net
statsfe1.ws.microsoft.com
 
Cortana sends data to the internet, even though it is disabled in Windows 10, which is a scandal that goes through already here , where it is stated that customer support Microsoft said that even after the "off" setting runs on Cortana, Cortana continues in record and store in memory, which confirms my analysis. 

Communication is really runs the servers MS still. This is not a bug, but a feature in Windows 10. Confirms it but my assumption that voice port is completely separated from the voice of Cortana and analysis on Windows 10 takes place at a lower level operating system without your knowledge, even though Cortana "uninstall". According voice samples, should be sufficient in number and amount of falling into the hands example. NSA, it would be possible to identify the person, for example. At airports from eavesdropping microphones with accuracy exceeding 99%, or wherever you approached the microphone.
 
Interestingly sending data from the voice port. Cortana first converts voice to text. They are sent to the server:
 
pre.footprintpredict.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
df.telemetry.microsoft.com
 
Cortana and then sends voice samples (.wav files), but not always. From the measurements, I found that Cortana has a basic dictionary installed locally, it can be seen learning algorithm distinguishes Cortana after a period of better words, and complex sentences and servers polls less frequent but larger volumes of data traffic, which is a bit disturbing.
 
Roughly 1 in 15 minutes is dispatched (when the computer is idle) a summary of data of nearly 80 MB on servers:
 
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
vortex-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
pre.footprintpredict.com
telemetry.appex.bing.net
telemetry.urs.microsoft.com
cs1.wpc.v0cdn.net
 
In the settings you can key keyboard logging, Cortana, her voice collecting samples and sending to Microsoft servers shut down, but the current version of Windows 10 has a "bug" and the data is sent regardless of the settings on this screen, even though Cortana is off and the same probably also applies to logging keyboard input.
 
This is too big a package on "metadata", so I have a reasonable suspicion that sends voice compressed .wav samples from user to analyze. Windows 10 is in normal use behave normally, not too much traffic to the Internet, but once you leave the computer and enters screensaver 15 minutes suspiciously high activity begins sending data. 

Here is for the sake of all Microsoft servers, on which the new Windows 10 " call "and transmit data about the user:
 
vortex.data.microsoft.com
vortex-win.data.microsoft.com
telecommand.telemetry.microsoft.com
telecommand.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com
oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
sqm.telemetry.microsoft.com
sqm.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
watson.telemetry.microsoft.com
watson.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
redir.metaservices.microsoft.com
choice.microsoft.com
choice.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
df.telemetry.microsoft.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
services.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
sqm.df.telemetry.microsoft.com
telemetry.microsoft.com
watson.ppe.telemetry.microsoft.com
telemetry.appex.bing.net
telemetry.urs.microsoft.com
telemetry.appex.bing.net:443
settings-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
vortex-sandbox.data.microsoft.com
survey.watson.microsoft.com
watson.live.com
watson.microsoft.com
statsfe2.ws.microsoft.com
corpext.msitadfs.glbdns2.microsoft.com
compatexchange.cloudapp.net
cs1.wpc.v0cdn.net
a-0001.a-msedge.net
statsfe2.update.microsoft.com.akadns.net
sls.update.microsoft.com.akadns.net
fe2.update.microsoft.com.akadns.net
diagnostics.support.microsoft.com
corp.sts.microsoft.com
statsfe1.ws.microsoft.com
pre.footprintpredict.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com
i1.services.social.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
feedback.windows.com
feedback.microsoft-hohm.com
feedback.search.microsoft.com
rad.msn.com
preview.msn.com
ad.doubleclick.net
ads.msn.com
ads1.msads.net
ads1.msn.com
a.ads1.msn.com
a.ads2.msn.com
adnexus.net
adnxs.com
az361816.vo.msecnd.net
az512334.vo.msecnd.net
 
The list of servers is taken from a Windows 10 application Destroy Spying see. below. In its testing, I caught a live communication servers with about half of that list.
 
Of course, the first thing that comes to mind is disabling communication with these servers (by introducing the server into the hosts file and settings to 127.0.0.1 localhost), but as I tried, after disabling the Windows 10 start acting suspiciously otherwise. Error messages pop up, sometimes the message of "service failure", there are problems with Skype, it is not possible to maintain a stable connection. The problem is with VPN connections that fail. But it is possible that this is just some incompatibilities and nevyladěnost new OS. 

Apparently, it is necessary not to prohibit certain sites and have available to make things work, but I had no time to analyze them one by one, what causes them off in the long run in Windows 10 .
 
If you do not have the technical knowledge and know how to manually edit the hosts file, you can use Windows 10 Destroy Spying, downloadable from the internet here . (http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/System-Tweak/Destroy-Windows-10-Spying.shtml)
 
Note that this does not guarantee anonymity because Windows 10 within the framework updates may download lists of other Microsoft server, respectively. Windows 10 themselves can write and change the settings in the hosts file, eg. In the diagnosis of Windows, without warning when you erase Windows server settings override the hosts file.
 
Windows 10 also bypass the hosts file, because some of the key Microsoft servers connect hard by IP addresses, ie. without communication with the DNS servers or the hosts file, but does not need to download updates. It is interesting that when you disable the hosts file on Windows Update servers, Windows 10 will join them as well, but directly with IP addresses and bypass override the hosts file. But it does not download updates. Basically, it's just sort of announcement by Microsoft that you disabled in the hosts file update servers. This is interesting behavior, certainly not an end in itself. Zeroing communication with servers across hosts file in addition suffer psychological instability in some programs and components. If you choose to use Windows 10, use this tool only if you know what you're doing.
 
Windows 10 because of its nature thought the shift to terminal service platform that collects information about the user, to give him in exchange for granted maximum service and adapt to their needs. However, there is a very high risk of misuse of biometric data (voice, eyes, face, etc.) and information privacy, business and family users. Capture text from the keyboard also poses a high risk to safety, where hackers can through security holes in Windows 10 in the future to capture the Windows 10 password entry to emails, banking, etc. Additionally, encrypted using the tools in Windows 10 loses sense because Windows 10 sees your fingers and hears what you say. So encrypted chat or encrypted SIP call to help.
Maybe that's why the Windows 10 for free?
If someone thought very badly and insidiously to spy on users and citizens, offering them a free operating system, or at least a free upgrade, which is riddled spyware  programs, the very foundation of the operating system. Windows 10 it is really free, for all owners of previous Windows operating systems from Version 7. But Microsoft is not the first with this idea. With that has come to Android from Google many years ago.
 
Until Microsoft makes available an explanation of what the servers collect, it is not safe to install Windows 10 on a production computer at home or at work or business. I would completely avoid this operating system should people encrypts data. In essence, the Windows 10 system is more analytical than operational. This represents a substantial risk for potential abuse.
Update
Because of the discussion questions appeared, with what instruments measurements were carried out, there is a list:

For monitoring network activity Windows 10 tools were used PRTG Network Monitor and Wireshark. Tracking data and program activities was used Windows Resource Monitor. 
Measurements were carried out on the installation of Windows 10 RTM Build 10240, ISO installer downloaded from the MSDN
Note: Anyone can make their own measurements. System for the transmission of telemetry data and algorithm sending user data to Microsoft servers is not known, so I welcome the experience of other volunteers to share readings and recitations transfer servers that Windows 10 contact. The server list is not exhaustive, here are a fresh change for a list of advertising and "3rd party" servers, which are Windows 10 to communicate:
 
licensing.md.mp.microsoft.com
solitaireprod.maelstrom.xboxlive.com
go.microsoft.com
tunnel.cfw.trustedsource.org
download-ssl.msgamestudios.com
mobileads.msn.com
fw.adsafeprotected.com
sc.iasds01.com
dt.adsafeprotected.com
ad.doubleclick.net
googleads4.g.doubleclick.net
dc.services.visualstudio.com
mpd.mxptint.net
updatekeepalive.mcafee.com
sm.mcafee.com
su3.mcafee.com
ocsp.usertrust.com
storeedgefd.dsx.mp.microsoft.com
mscrl.microsoft.com
 
With some of these servers communicate and play Solitaire on Windows 10, the source of information here . As you can see, my measurements not only a list of servers on which Windows 10 "call", seems to be about endless. Remember the Czech proverb that "beggars can not be choosers?" So the teeth of this "horse" you should definitely take a look because it might sooner or later begin to bite.
 
-Administrator-

Source:
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=cs&tl=en&u=http://aeronet.cz/news/analyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu/

http://aeronet.cz/news/analyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-jde-o-pouhy-terminal-na-sber-informaci-o-uzivateli-jeho-prstech-ocich-a-hlasu/
________________